SAHM position papers represent the official opinions and recommendations of the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine (SAHM; herein referred to as “the Society”) on important issues relevant to the health and well-being of adolescents and young adults (AYA). Position papers reflect the mission and values of the Society. Upon approval by the Society’s Board of Directors (BOD), position papers are published in the Journal of Adolescent Health, posted on the Society’s website and referenced in Index Medicus as authored by SAHM. 

The purpose of SAHM positons are to: 

  • Provide justification for an opinion or recommendation on issues relevant to the health and well-being of AYA that may be controversial, need clarification for professionals, or represent an issue deserving advocacy on behalf of AYA;
  • Inform and assist in the development of improved services for AYA;
  • Provide direction to facilitate appropriate action from members, other professionals, policy- and law-makers, and the public;
  • Make evidence-based (or expert consensus when evidence is not available) recommendations that could be used to influence policy; and
  • Express a positive and proactive call to action to promote the optimal health and well-being for all AYA.

SAHM Director of Publications and the Publications Editorial Board
The Director of Publications provides oversight and leadership of the Publications Editorial Board (see below) in the ongoing conception, development, review and approval processes of position papers and reports directly to the President of the Society. 

SAHM`s Publications Editorial Board (PEB) is a group of SAHM members who, under the leadership of the Director of Publications, provides leadership in the development (assessment of need, quality and content) of position papers for the Society and reports its findings, through the Director of Publications, to the BOD for their review and approval. The Publications Editorial Board consists of the following members: 

  • Paula Braverman, MD, FSAHM; Director of Publications
  • Sinem Alkgul, MD, PhD
  • David Bell, MD, MPH
  • Swati Bhave, MD, DCH, FIAP, FAAP(H)
  • Deborah Christie, PhD, FSAHM 
  • Jonathan Ellen, MD, MPH
  • Devon Hensel, PhD, FSAHM
  • David Inwards-Breland, MD, MPH
  • Debra Katzman, MD, FSAHM
  • Manuel Angel Oscos-Sanchez, MD
  • John Santelli, MD, MPH, FSAHM 
  • Kathleen Tebb, PhD, FSAHM

How to Submit a Proposal for a SAHM Position Paper

Position paper proposals (new papers and/or revisions of existing papers) may be proposed by one of the following individuals/groups:

  • SAHM member(s)
  • SAHM Committee or Special Interest Group (SIG)
  • SAHM Publications Editorial Board
  • SAHM Board of Directors

The SAHM BOD can also consider proposals for publication of joint statements in collaboration with other professional organizations or endorse the previously published statement of another professional organization.  Such requests are to be directed to the SAHM Director of Publications. 
 
Position Paper Intent Form (download a position paper intent form)
The position paper intent form is the mechanism by which the BOD approves the initiation and coordination of position paper development. The intent identifies the topic, the need, the methodology used, and the authoring group of the proposed position paper.
  
The authoring group is responsible for completing and submitting the intent form to the Director of Publications as instructed on the intent form. Submissions will first be reviewed by the PEB and a member of the PEB will be assigned as the PEB representative (herein referred to as “the representative”) for that intent. The PEB will determine if the proposed position materials are complete and recommends revisions if applicable prior to submission to the BOD for review. The PEB may seek consultation from others (Executive Committee or peer review) on the submitted intent document as needed. If revisions are required, the assigned representative will return the intent form to the lead author with applicable feedback. If no revisions are necessary, the Director of Publications on behalf of the assigned representative will present the intent form to the BOD for review at their next scheduled meeting. The intent form must receive BOD approval before a draft of the position paper is developed.


SAHM Board of Directors Meeting Schedule
The following deadlines are when intent forms need to be submitted to ensure it can be reviewed by the SAHM BOD at their next scheduled meeting (pending approval of the Director of Publications)

The 2020/2021 Board of Directors meeting schedule has not yet been confirmed.

Authoring Group Criteria
Authors of SAHM position papers must be members in good standing with the Society. The lead author can request for a non-member consultant be added for BOD approval. Authoring groups may include a maximum of ten individuals, with assurance that all have meet the authorship criteria provided below. Requests for additional authors above the maximum allotment must be submitted in writing to the Director of Publications along with the intent form. The authoring group should include the diversity, interdisciplinary nature and geographic spread of the Society.

To be listed as a contributing author on a SAHM position paper, the author must meet the following criteria:

  • Has made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the positions; or the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data supporting these positions.
  • Drafted the work or made revisions critically important to the intellectual content.
  • Provided final approval prior to submission.
  • Agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Individuals who participate in the development of the paper but do not meet all of the above mentioned criteria can be acknowledged at the end of the paper as contributors.

Financial Disclosures (download a financial disclosure form)
Each member of the authoring group must disclose all conflicts of interest and affiliations with industry, government and others by completing a financial disclosure form. Authors must disclose all financial interests or relationships within the past five years and the foreseeable future that are relevant to the subject matter or content of the position paper. 

The collection and submission of each listed authors completed disclosure forms is the responsibility of the lead author and must be included alongside the completed draft paper. Financial disclosure forms will be maintained by the SAHM Office.
 

Guidelines for Developing a Draft Position Paper 

Once an intent form is approved by the SAHM BOD, author groups have six months from the date they are notified of approval to submit a completed position paper draft. Completed drafts are to be submitted to the assigned PEB representative and the Director of Publications. Requests for an extension must be submitted in writing to the assigned PEB representative and the Director of Publications. If a draft position paper is not submitted within six months of the intent forms approval and an extension request was not submitted or approved, a new intent form is required before the draft position paper can reviewed by the SAHM BOD.
 
Structure of Position Papers
Position papers should be limited to 2,500 words counting from the statement of the problem through the summary and not including the abstract, initial listing of the positions or references. 

Position papers should include most of the following elements:

Title: The title must reflect the intent/purpose of the positions clearly and concisely.

Abstract: This summary should be a concise paragraph (250 words maximum) that includes reason/purpose and summary of the overall concept(s) of the position paper.

SAHM Positions: Each position paper should list SAHM’s positions at the beginning of the paper. New positions must be consistent (non-conflicting) with established positions, unless an explanation is provided discussing the change.  

Statement of the Problem: This section should serve as an introductory section of the position paper, where the authors provide a concise overview of the topic and why it is important. 

Method(s): This section should outline the methodology used to develop and substantiate the positions stated in the position paper (i.e., review of the literature and/or expert consensus). Recommended language “This position paper was based on a comprehensive review of the scientific literature, review of existing practice guidelines (if applicable) and consensus opinion among the multidisciplinary group of expert co-authors”.

Positions and Recommendations: To include up-to-date evidence-based information or expert consensus that provides justification for each of the stated positions. This section should be organized with each position as a header followed by the evidence or expert consensus which supports the position. 

Summary: The summary should be a brief three to five sentence summary of the most important take home points from the position paper. The positions themselves should not be restated.

Authors: Members of the authoring group, their affiliations, and disclosures are listed at the end of each position paper.

References: The references serve as the scientific justification and should be peer–reviewed research articles, public policy documents or state-of-the-art articles or books from the literature.  There should be no more than 35 references. References should be formatted according to the current requirements of the Journal of Adolescent Health.

Adolescent and young adult (AYA) and/or parent education handout, where applicable: AYA and/or parent education handouts deal with specific AYA health topics. AYA and/or parent education handouts are to be written by health care providers who have expertise on the specific topic. AYA and/or parent education handouts should provide an overview of the condition/issue, and information on treatment options. They should be written in simple and clear language to convey the message(s). AYA and/or parent education are for educational purposes. AYA handouts will be available on SAHM website and can be printed from this website.

Important note: Position papers are not intended to be review papers, but rather a statement of the positions with a concise presentation of background material specifically related to those positions. Review papers should be submitted to the Journal of Adolescent Health per journal guidelines. 


Overview of Review Process for Submitted Draft Position Papers 

Position papers are submitted to the assigned PEB representative and the Director of Publications for review. All position papers submitted must be of a quality similar to that of a manuscript that would be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. As such, all position papers must follow the structure outlined above and be carefully proofread for grammar, punctuation and readability or they will be returned to the authoring group. If the PEB determines the position paper is ready, it is forwarded for peer review.  After peer review, the representative from the PEB under the supervision of the Director of Publications will return the paper to the authors for revisions, or forward the paper to the BOD, if comments are minor.  The authors are expected to respond to peer-review comments with a detailed explanation of responses and changes within four weeks. The PEB will review the revisions and decide if the revised paper is ready for submission to the BOD for review.

Timeline for submitting completed position papers:
Deadline to submit to ensure it can be reviewed by Board of Directors – (pending approval of the Director of Publications) 

The 2020/2021 Board of Directors meeting schedule has not yet been confirmed.

  • Upon review, the BOD will decide to do one of the following:
  • Approve the completed paper as presented
  • Approve the completed paper with minor edits
  • Reject the completed paper  

If the completed paper is approved by the BOD, it will be submitted to the Managing Editor of the Journal of Adolescent Health for publication. The authoring group will be asked to assist with drafting language to be used to announce the newly published statement to the membership/press releases. 

If the paper is approved with minor edits, the representative from PEB will return the paper to the lead author and share the BOD requested edits. The authoring group will be given two months to resubmit the revised paper to the Director of Publications with a detailed explanation of the responses and revisions. If applicable, the authoring group may submit a written explanation for consideration describing why BOD requested changes were not made. The PEB will review the revisions and determine if the BOD feedback has been adequately addressed or requires further review by the BOD.  If the PEB feels that the revisions were adequately addressed, they will submit the paper to the Journal of Adolescent Health for publication.
 

Publication of SAHM Position Papers

Approved position papers will be published in the Journal of Adolescent Health and posted on the SAHM website.

The review process for position papers may need to be expedited if there are recommendations of an urgent nature that have a significant and direct impact on the practice of adolescent and young adult health.  The Director of Publications will work directly with the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Adolescent Health to coordinate and expedite the publication process so that the information is disseminated to the membership and readership in a timely fashion.

Because of copyright and reprint concerns, position papers will not be published in other organizations’ journals before publication in the Journal of Adolescent Health. Exceptions are made if it is previously determined that a joint position paper will be published simultaneously in the Journal of Adolescent Health and the official journal of the co-authoring entity.
 

Duration of SAHM Position Papers

SAHM position papers undergo review five years after initial publication or more often as needed. This review will be initiated by the Director of Publications (as result of five-year timeline or at the request of the BOD, Special Interest Group or SAHM Committee). The review will be conducted by one of the following groups: the authoring group (see Development Process), other appropriate committee, or by the Executive Committee (EC) – at the request of the Director of Publications or BOD.  This review will recommend if the position should be reaffirmed, retired or revised. The recommendations from the review will be reported to the Director of Publications who will report to the BOD.
 
Revision Process
The lead author and their respective authoring groups will be expected to conduct a review of their position paper when older than five years from initial publication. In addition, the PEB or the BOD may request a review of a position paper prior to the mandatory review period if there has been significant/important changes to the content of the current position paper under consideration.

If the BOD recommends revising the position paper, then the Director of Publications will contact the most recent lead author.  The lead author will contact their authoring group and notify them of the BOD’s request to revise. If the lead author can no longer take on this responsibility, they will recommend a SAHM member who can.  The PEB will review this recommendation with the BOD.  If the lead author is approved by the BOD, the Director of Publications will ask this member if they would take on the role and responsibility of the lead author in the revision of the position paper. If the lead author agrees, the individual will confirm that the most recent authoring group is interested in participating in the revision. If this is not the case, the lead author can identify other group members. The authoring group will have 12 months to submit the revised position paper to the PEB. 

(Back to Top)

More in this Section